Assessment for members
Is your agent ecosystem under control?
Describe the AI agents, tools and data your organisation runs. You get a scored assessment in about 15 minutes: what is exposed, what to fix first and what to read, tuned to your industry. It is free, private to you and the site owner, and you can delete it at any time.
How it works
- Create an account. Confirm your email, and turn on two-step verification if you like. Create your organisation, or accept an invitation to one. Invite colleagues as viewers (read only) or editors (create and change assessments).
- Describe your setup. The data and systems you hold, your MCP servers and the tools each one offers, the agents that call them, any gateway or guardrail in between (authentication, authorisation, prompt injection filters), and 28 short questions across 9 areas. Save a draft and come back.
- Get the assessment. A score and level, the first three things to do, a map of your ecosystem with the risky parts marked, and a zoomable globe that takes you to your country, your city and your building, with third-party agents and tools drawn outside on the internet, every finding explained, and reading from the PADAWAN reports. The site owner may add a written review.
What it looks at
- Know your agentsYou cannot protect what you cannot list.
- Identity and accessWhat agents can do is decided by the credentials they hold.
- Human oversightWhere a person stays in the loop, and whether the agent can skip it.
- ContainmentHow far a manipulated or mistaken agent can get.
- Tools and MCPEvery tool an agent can call is part of its attack surface.
- Data and knowledgeWhat agents read, who wrote it, and where it goes.
- Monitoring and responseWhether you would notice, and what you would do.
- Supply chain and changeWhat you let agents install, and how change is controlled.
- Governance and accountabilityPolicy, regulation, insurance and people.
The kind of thing it finds
- criticalAgents rely on shared or static credentials
A shared key means one leak exposes every agent and the logs cannot tell them apart. Static keys sit in config, traces and chat history until someone notices.
- criticalNo dependable human approval on risky actions
If approval is a habit rather than a control, a manipulated agent simply does the thing. This is the most common route from an injected instruction to real loss.
- criticalOutsider-written content is read as trusted
This is how prompt injection works in practice: a ticket, email or web page carries instructions that the agent obeys.
- criticalTool servers without authentication
Internet scans find unauthenticated MCP servers by the thousand. Inside a network, one compromised host or agent can use every open server.
It also looks at how your ecosystem is wired. For example, an agent that reads text outsiders can write, can see confidential data and can send things out has a ready-made prompt injection path, and the assessment says so by name.
Your answers stay private
- Only the people of your own organisation, and the site owner, can read what you submit. Never other organisations or other members.
- The scoring uses fixed rules, not AI. The only thing that ever goes to an AI service is the optional "Describe it instead" box: if you use it, your text and the text files you add are sent to a model on Amazon Bedrock, processed in the United States (AWS us-east-1), to draft the setup for you to review. Please do not include personal data or secrets. It has size limits and a daily quota, nothing is kept from it, and the answers you give in the wizard are never sent.
- Describe your setup in general terms. Never enter passwords, keys or other secrets.
- Your assessments are stored in the EU. Delete an assessment, or ask for your account to be removed, whenever you want.